“The tribunal has power to impose sanctions according to the law. It is a court with specific criminal jurisdiction.”
Regarding whether the CCT was properly constituted to try Saraki, the three-man panel of judges led by Moore Adumein held that the tribunal was properly constituted to try the senate president.
Adumein stated that the two-man panel of the CCT was the minimum quorum required according to the interpretation act to sit in judgment on any issue; hence the tribunal did not err in law to commence trial against Saraki with a two-man panel.
On October 19, the appellate court had adjourned ruling on the case between Saraki and the code of conduct tribunal (CCT).
In September, Saraki approached the court seeking to stop his trial for alleged false declaration of assets at the CCT.
Arguing the appeal on October 16, Joseph Daodu (SAN), Saraki’s lawyer, urged the court to halt the trial of his client at the CCT on the grounds that the tribunal was not properly constituted, and that it had no powers to handle criminal matters.
“The composition of the tribunal during the trial of my client violated paragraphs 15(1) of the 1999 Constitution by sitting with two members instead of three,” he had said.
“My Lord we are seeking the court’s understanding to nullify the CCT proceedings of last month due to lack of quorum.”
The trial of the senate president is expected to continue at the CCT on November 5.