today-is-a-good-day
4.3 C
New York
Thursday, March 28, 2024
HomeNewsMoney laundering: EFCC confronts ex-Gov. Lamido with myriad of evidence

Money laundering: EFCC confronts ex-Gov. Lamido with myriad of evidence

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Tuesday tendered a myriad of documentary evidence before Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja to further establish its claim on how the former Jigawa State Governor, Sule Lamido, and his co-travellers defrauded the State.
Lamido is being prosecuted alongside his two sons, Aminu and Mustapha, and two others on a 27-count charge bordering on abuse of office and money laundering.
The other two on trial are Bamaina Holdings Limited and Speeds International Limited.
With prosecution witness 18, Micheal Wetkas, in the witness box, counsel to the EFCC, Chile Okoroma, presented bank payment vouchers of Dantata and Sawoe Construction Company Limited, invoices of Bamaina Company Limited, waybills/delivery notes of Bamaina Company Limited and copies of cheques of millions of naira from various banks in favour of Bamaina Company Limited.
The documents were admitted as Exhibits EFCC 112(a-b), EFCC 113 (a-f), EFCC 113 (a-g), EFCC 114(a-e), EFCC 115(a-f), EFCC 116 (a-f), EFCC 117(a-g), EFCC 118(a-e), EFCC 119(a-g), EFCC 120(a-j), EFCC 121(a-g), EFCC 122(a-g), EFCC 123(a-f), EFCC 124(a-g), EFCC 125(a-g), EFCC 126(a-h), EFCC 127 (a-f) and EFCC 128(a-g).
These represent documentation for sub-contracts allegedly carried out by Bamaina Holdings Limited for Dantata and Sawoe Construction Company.
Justice Ademola observed that if the documents speak for themselves, there was no reason for individual admission of each document in the open court as it was a painstaking process.
He said the witness’ preliminary evidence laid the basis for their admissibility and requested that the prosecution makes all the documentary evidence available to the defence for review in order to facilitate speedy progress on the case.
Responding, Chile Okoroma stated that the defence had insisted on individual admission of evidence at a previous sitting so that exhibit numbers would be assigned and context of the evidence would be established.
The defense counsel, Joe Agbi (SAN), earlier represented by Offiong Effiong Bassey Offiong (SAN), had complained that the documents were arranged in no particular order and had to be front loaded by the prosecutor before being admitted in evidence.
Documents further admitted in evidence were: a letter of proposal for supply of consumables to Dantata and Sawoe Construction Company Limited from Speeds International Limited, bank payment vouchers of Dantata and Sawoe Construction Company Limited, invoices of Speeds International Limited, waybills/delivery notes of Speeds International Limited, copies of cheques of millions of naira from various banks, in favour of Speeds International Limited.
The documents were admitted as Exhibits EFCC 129, EFCC 130(a-f), EFCC 131(a-f), EFCC 132(a-f), EFCC 133(a-f), EFCC 134(a-f), EFCC 135(a-f), EFCC 136(a-f), EFCC 137(a-f),  EFCC 138(a-f), EFCC 139(a-f), EFCC 140(a-f), EFCC 141(a-f), EFCC 142(a-f), EFCC 143(a-f), EFCC 144(a-f), EFCC 145(a-f), EFCC 146(a-d), EFCC 147(a-f), EFCC 148(a-f), EFCC 149(a-f) and EFCC 150(a-f).
Realizing that further admission of documentary evidence in this manner was indeed strenuous, counsel agreed to sort through further documentary evidence and admit them in bulk.
The case has been adjourned to June 1, 2016 for continuation of trial.

Advertisements
Advertisements

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

Onuegbu Chuks Theophilus on Mikel Obi quits Super Eagles
Thomas H. Anderson on Roman Goddess_3
Oladimeji Emmanuel on Obama sends investors to Buhari